Newcastle Uni
School of Chemical Engineering and Advanced Materials
Introduction
Thesis layout
Thesis structure
Flow of contents
Contents of key chapters
Citation styles
The reference list
Numbering and captions
Final remarks
Other resources and tools
WRITING RESEARCH THESES OR DISSERTATIONS
(guidelines and tips)
THE "LITERATURE REVIEW"

There are many titles for this chapter, e.g. "Literature Survey"; "Previous Work", and other similar phrases. The Literature Review is there for you to:

  • provide details about the motivation for the project
  • state why the problem addressed by the dissertation is important
  • set the scene for the work described in the dissertation
  • describe what others have done and hence sets a benchmark for the current project
  • jusify the use of specific solution techniques or problem solving procedures in your work

It is called the Literature Review because the contents of this chapter are based on published material. A thorough literature review is essential because it shows that you have studied rigorously what others have done. This lends credibility when you state the problem the dissertation is addressing, and when you provide reasons as to why obtaining a solution is important. Where applicable, you should also include a critique of the available solutions to the problem that your are tackling. This would implicitly provide justifications for the project and, at the same time, establish benchmarks against which your contributions can be assessed. Therefore, make sure that you seek out the most recent information relating to your field of study. You may, if you wish, include a discussion about your approach to the problem, and which of the published work will form the basis of your investigations.

The Literature Review is obviously a very important chapter. However, students doing research for the first time often find it difficult to write. There are a number of reasons for this:

  • they do not know where to look for information
  • there may be a huge amount of published work on the subject area, dating back many years, and they find it difficult to judge which material is relevant
  • the work is a "hot-topic" and keeping track of the state-of-the-art is difficult
  • they find it difficult to summarise the ideas and results of numerous publications into a coherent single account

Unfortunately, much of these skills can be gained only through experience. The following tips will, hopefully, make life that much easier.

Tips
  • Most libraries have personnel who specialise in certain disciplines. Ask them for information about publications relevant to your field of study, whether they are held in stock and where they are located in the library.

  • Nowadays, an increasing number of journals are available on-line, accessed via web browsers. Many libraries subscribe to these electronic journals, meaning that you can read, download or print articles from the comfort of your computer workstation. Even if your library does not have a subscription to a particular journal, you should still be able to read the abstract. If the article looks interesting and relevant, you could order a copy. Again, approach your librarian for advice (and your supervisor or advisor for finance).

    Students at Newcastle will find the following links useful:

  • Make it a point to keep abreast of developments in your field of study by making regular visits to the library and to the electronic journals websites.

  • When reading a technical paper, jot down the key points and make a note of the journal or technical publication where the paper was published. Devise a cataloguing system that will allow you to retrieve the paper quickly. This will come in handy when you write the Literature Survey, and when you compile the reference list.

  • When writing the Literature Review

    • include only those work that is relevant to your research. You may have read dozens upon dozens of papers, but there will be some that do not contribute to the points that your are trying to make, or there will be papers that give identical information. Because of the time you spent trying to understand them, you may be tempted incorporate all that you have read. Attempting to do this will make what is already a difficult task impossible.
    • make sure that you have read and understood cited work, otherwise you can get into hot water. Assessors like to ask questions like: "So tell me what you understand about the proposal by Smith and Wesson 1945)".
    • organise your content according to ideas instead of individual publications. This helps ensure the smooth flow of contents and make the chapter more readable. It also shows that you have an appreciation of the subject area.
    • do not simply quote or paraphrase the contents of published articles. You should try to weave the information into focussed views, incorporating where possible, your own opinions and comments. This will demonstrate your deeper understanding of the topic.
 
© Copyright 2001-2009
All rights reserved
 
 
Updated: 1 May, 2001

 Written by Ming Tham. Please email comments and suggestions to: ming.tham@ncl.ac.uk